Despite Phil's protestations, faith is defined by believing something ''without'' evidence. Faith is a feeling, often a decision, to believe in something grander than nature/science. When one is overwhelmed with religious feeling or epiphany, this is a subjective phenomenon. As most of us know, applying science to God rarely leaves either smelling right. Dawkins denies the value of the concept of ''nonoverlapping magisteria'', but it really is a useful concept, and probably more so for Theists than Atheists. I don't want someone coming after my faith with an electron microscope.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:17, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | Despite Phil's protestations, faith is defined by believing something ''without'' evidence. Faith is a feeling, often a decision, to believe in something grander than nature/science. When one is overwhelmed with religious feeling or epiphany, this is a subjective phenomenon. As most of us know, applying science to God rarely leaves either smelling right. Dawkins denies the value of the concept of ''nonoverlapping magisteria'', but it really is a useful concept, and probably more so for Theists than Atheists. I don't want someone coming after my faith with an electron microscope.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 14:17, 8 April 2007 (EDT) |