Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:Has conservapedia failed to reach a critical mass? (view source)

Revision as of 18:57, April 8, 2007

467 bytes added ,  18:57, April 8, 2007
→‎NO!
Line 14: Line 14:     
::I have two snapshots of the Top 50 at [[User:Sid 3050/Popularity]], spanning one week. But that's just that: One set of snapshots. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:38, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::I have two snapshots of the Top 50 at [[User:Sid 3050/Popularity]], spanning one week. But that's just that: One set of snapshots. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:38, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: It would be interesting if see the data on Wikipedia in its first few years.  I did learn that Wikipedia did not reach 450,000 entries, many of which are/were complete trivia (like the title of a rock song), until more than 4 years after it began.  Also, I think Wikipedia copied tens of thousands of entries directly from 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, and many of those outdated entries remain to this day.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:57, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==Comments==
 
==Comments==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/93460"

Navigation menu