Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count? (view source)

Revision as of 21:42, January 6, 2007

364 bytes added ,  21:42, January 6, 2007
no edit summary
Line 59: Line 59:     
They are not entries, just lists,  How about if we changed to say "2600 (or whatever the correct number is) entries and 250 term lists."
 
They are not entries, just lists,  How about if we changed to say "2600 (or whatever the correct number is) entries and 250 term lists."
 +
 +
'''Resolution:'''  That's a great idea, Tim!  Go ahead and make that change.  There might be a way to improve on "term lists," such as "study key term lists" or some other more descriptive phrase.  Perhaps even a link to explain it!!  You can decide whether such a link should itself count as an entry!  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:42, 6 January 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,214

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/9349"

Navigation menu