Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
19 bytes added ,  19:04, November 8, 2011
m
internal link
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Homosexual logic''' is the "logic" used to justify the [[Homosexual Agenda]].  Like [[liberal logic]] generally, homosexual logic relies on statements that appear to be logical but that are actually rife with [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]].  Examples include:
 
'''Homosexual logic''' is the "logic" used to justify the [[Homosexual Agenda]].  Like [[liberal logic]] generally, homosexual logic relies on statements that appear to be logical but that are actually rife with [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]].  Examples include:
−
#Calling things the opposite of what they are, e.g., justifying their [[special rights]] as just another form of [[Equal Protection Clause|equal protection]].
+
#Calling things [[stolen concept|the opposite of what they are]], e.g., justifying their [[special rights]] as just another form of [[Equal Protection Clause|equal protection]].
 
#Improperly shifting the [[burden of proof]] by asserting that homosexuality must be understood as not a choice until it is [[Logical_fallacy#Argument_from_silence|conclusively shown]] to be one.
 
#Improperly shifting the [[burden of proof]] by asserting that homosexuality must be understood as not a choice until it is [[Logical_fallacy#Argument_from_silence|conclusively shown]] to be one.
 
#[[Slippery slope]] arguments in which they argue that repression of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.
 
#[[Slippery slope]] arguments in which they argue that repression of homosexuality will lead to a series of bad results that actually will not follow or that have nothing to do with homosexuality.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu