Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
29 bytes added ,  16:15, November 9, 2011
Line 39: Line 39:  
== Transitional Forms ==
 
== Transitional Forms ==
   −
There are thousands of transitional forms. Just look in a Natural History museum. Yes, there are a few missing links that have not yet been found, like the transition of dinosaurs to birds (archaepteryx could be, but more research is needed) but for most transitions, there are plenty. There are transitional forms that have been found that show the transformation of a hippo/bovine-like animal to whales and dolphins. This article should change to reflect this.
+
There are thousands of transitional forms. Just look in a Natural History museum. Yes, there are a few missing links that have not yet been found, like the transition of dinosaurs to birds (archaepteryx could be, but more research is needed) but for most transitions, there are plenty. There are transitional forms that have been found that show the transformation of a hippo/bovine-like animal to whales and dolphins. This article should change to reflect this. - [[User:Samsonnn]]
 
:You forgot the fact that these so-called "transitionals" are transitional because someone said so.  Saying so is one thing, ''proving so'' is quite another, and until someone sees it actually take place (read "film at eleven") then we're not going to take the word of a scientist saying it's a fact that animal A evolved into animal B because he stuck what he called a transitional between the two.  Conservapedia is not going to call evolution a fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:10, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
:You forgot the fact that these so-called "transitionals" are transitional because someone said so.  Saying so is one thing, ''proving so'' is quite another, and until someone sees it actually take place (read "film at eleven") then we're not going to take the word of a scientist saying it's a fact that animal A evolved into animal B because he stuck what he called a transitional between the two.  Conservapedia is not going to call evolution a fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 10:10, 9 November 2011 (EST)
:::There are not thousands of transitional forms as can be seen [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils HERE] and [http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-3 HERE] and [http://conservapedia.com/Evolution#Lack_of_Any_Clear_Transitional_Forms HERE] and [http://creation.com/fossils-questions-and-answers HERE]. As for your comment, "more research is needed", you might want to read [[Essay: As always, there is more work to be done|this essay]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:10, 9 November 2011 (EST)
+
:::Samsonn, there are not thousands of transitional forms as can be seen [http://creation.com/that-quote-about-the-missing-transitional-fossils HERE] and [http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-3 HERE] and [http://conservapedia.com/Evolution#Lack_of_Any_Clear_Transitional_Forms HERE] and [http://creation.com/fossils-questions-and-answers HERE]. As for your comment, "more research is needed", you might want to read [[Essay: As always, there is more work to be done|this essay]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:10, 9 November 2011 (EST)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,925

edits

Navigation menu