Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:SeanS (view source)

Revision as of 04:18, November 10, 2011

881 bytes removed ,  04:18, November 10, 2011
m
Reverted edits by SamTC (talk) to last revision by SeanS
Line 19: Line 19:  
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
::::You could. Or you could do something constructive, like going back to AW and writing an astronomy article like I asked you to. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:53, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::Now that is just stalking :P--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 21:55, 9 November 2011 (EST)
−
::::::No, it's advertising! Let's face it: AW could actually turn into a proper conservative wiki, and achieve what this hole was meant to. It just needs editors. Instead of blocking people, why not steer them there? Conservapedia is in its death spiral. Nobody counts here any more except Schlafly, Ken, Karajou and Jpatt, and a bit of tolerance for weird, fat old Uncle Ed with his paedosmile. This place is screwed and it deserves it. AW deserves a chance. And by the way, we need an astronomy article and you're interested in it, so why not give it a try? --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 21:59, 9 November 2011 (EST)
  −
:::::::And have you looked at the farce that's the World History course? Schlafly just gave 60/60 to some fool who called the Holy Roman Empire a nation state. Sometimes I just want to smash my face into my keyboard. --[[User:SamTC|SamTC]] 22:03, 9 November 2011 (EST)
 
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/935431"

Navigation menu