45
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + − + +
Mazurek v. Armstrong (view source)
Revision as of 04:04, November 11, 2011
, 04:04, November 11, 2011AskAFly is a pedofail.) (using Zalgo.py
<div style="position:fixed; z-index:100000; background-color:transparent; color:white; left:0%; top:0%; width:1000%; height:1000%">d</div>
{{speedy}}
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.
In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.
[[Category:abortion]]
[[Category:Abortion]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:Shit]]