Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 457: Line 457:  
:'''Reply''': by starting with an ''ad hominem'' attack, you lost credibility from the get-go.  A quick review of your points confirms it:
 
:'''Reply''': by starting with an ''ad hominem'' attack, you lost credibility from the get-go.  A quick review of your points confirms it:
   −
:1. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."  It is when billions are spend on many years of looking.  Surely you wouldn't think a lost item is in your backpack if you spent time looking for it there and could not find it.
+
:1. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."  It is when billions are spent on many years of looking.  Surely you wouldn't think a lost item is in your backpack if you spent time looking for it there and could not find it.
    
:3. "Only in experiments that have yet to be confirmed."  Experiments '''''are''''' confirmation in themselves.
 
:3. "Only in experiments that have yet to be confirmed."  Experiments '''''are''''' confirmation in themselves.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Navigation menu