Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: +
→Transitional Forms
Regarding the link to the Conservapedia section of 'lack of transitional forms', I have made it clear that I find it fallacious; that is why I am talking about it here, so I can get a consensus to correct it. And the links to the creationist website are full of fallacies also. And as I have said, because it was written by a creationist, who has clearly already made up his mind about evolution, and not a biologist, then I don't think that it is a reliable citation. Give me a link to the work of an actual scientist and I will listen. --[[User:Samsonnn|Samsonnn]] 12:27, 13 November 2011 (EST)
Regarding the link to the Conservapedia section of 'lack of transitional forms', I have made it clear that I find it fallacious; that is why I am talking about it here, so I can get a consensus to correct it. And the links to the creationist website are full of fallacies also. And as I have said, because it was written by a creationist, who has clearly already made up his mind about evolution, and not a biologist, then I don't think that it is a reliable citation. Give me a link to the work of an actual scientist and I will listen. --[[User:Samsonnn|Samsonnn]] 12:27, 13 November 2011 (EST)
:::I cited biologists in this article. You still did not address the evidence I presented. You won't be editing at Conservapedia anymore due to your poor contributions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:00, 13 November 2011 (EST)