3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 349:
Line 349: + + + +
Debate:Should gay marriage be allowed? (view source)
Revision as of 01:10, November 17, 2011
, 01:10, November 17, 2011no edit summary
* Civil partnerships should be independent of marriages - meaning that every marriage should be a civil partnership, but not every civil partnership should be a marriage. And civil partnerships shouldn't be restricted to couples; they should allow more than two, and even close relatives, to join. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 15:33, 13 July 2010 (EDT)
* Civil partnerships should be independent of marriages - meaning that every marriage should be a civil partnership, but not every civil partnership should be a marriage. And civil partnerships shouldn't be restricted to couples; they should allow more than two, and even close relatives, to join. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] 15:33, 13 July 2010 (EDT)
==Yes & No==
Marriage should not be recognized by law; it should be restricted to religious unions between people. A civil union should be recognized by law to eliminate all problems with religious definitions of marriage. Problem solved. Anyone can marry anyone provided their religion allows it, and any two people (consenting, of appropriate age, and not too closely related) may be joined legally together. Atheism Rocks 20:10, 16 November 2011 (EST)