SkipCaptcha
3,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + +
Talk:Mystery:Why do people choose homosexuality? (view source)
Revision as of 05:23, November 18, 2011
, 05:23, November 18, 2011no edit summary
::::If my gay desires are selfish, your straight desires are also selfish. Imagine having to live a life with no wife to love. It's a lot harder than it sounds, huh? Unnatural and sinful are too totally separate things. It is unnatural for a couple to marry but to decide to not have children, but there is nothing wrong with that, is there? *cough* Yes, my rectum does have but one purpose that I am fully aware of. Anal sex was never attractive to me. If I was gay and supported abortion, I would support the murder of millions of innocent fetuses. That's a lot worse than homosexuality could ever be. If you're using the argument that a homosexual world would go extinct, than senior citizens being married should also be banned. --[[User:Bocaj910|Bocaj910]] 23:33, 17 November 2011 (EST)
::::If my gay desires are selfish, your straight desires are also selfish. Imagine having to live a life with no wife to love. It's a lot harder than it sounds, huh? Unnatural and sinful are too totally separate things. It is unnatural for a couple to marry but to decide to not have children, but there is nothing wrong with that, is there? *cough* Yes, my rectum does have but one purpose that I am fully aware of. Anal sex was never attractive to me. If I was gay and supported abortion, I would support the murder of millions of innocent fetuses. That's a lot worse than homosexuality could ever be. If you're using the argument that a homosexual world would go extinct, than senior citizens being married should also be banned. --[[User:Bocaj910|Bocaj910]] 23:33, 17 November 2011 (EST)
:::::Your counter statements are not convincing. Your gay relationships are not love, they are lust. You can love another man as a companion. When the relationship becomes sexual than you embrace lust and sin. Christians who do not conform to your views should be ashamed is laughable. Lucky for you, you aren't living in Iran. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:09, 18 November 2011 (EST)
:::::Your counter statements are not convincing. Your gay relationships are not love, they are lust. You can love another man as a companion. When the relationship becomes sexual than you embrace lust and sin. Christians who do not conform to your views should be ashamed is laughable. Lucky for you, you aren't living in Iran. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:09, 18 November 2011 (EST)
:::::"Imagine having to live a life with no wife to love. It's a lot harder than it sounds, huh?" A pedophile (which is not something I'm comparing you to) could use the same argument and it would be equally valid. Just because it gives you pleasure does not mean its good, or else we would legalise just about every narcotic there is.
:::::"It is unnatural for a couple to marry but to decide to not have children, but there is nothing wrong with that, is there?" I would argue that if the two hypothetical lovers here were capable of producing children but decided not to then yes, it would be wrong. I think Rick Santorum got it right [http://www.drudge.com/news/149654/santorum-contraception-not-ok in regards to contraception].
:::::On a side note, I must inform you that this website encourages actuall contributions to article rather than spending excessive amount of time on talk pages, ie if 90% or more of your edits are to talk page than you might be liable for a block. I you want to stay here I suggest that you start making more edits to articles than talk pages, I'm sure that as long that you're adding factual content supported by citations you contributions you be welcomed regardless of your views. - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 00:23, 18 November 2011 (EST)