Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 103: Line 103:  
:This article is ridiculous as it stands.  The article should restrict itself to decribing YEC, not refuting evolution...that is for another place.   
 
:This article is ridiculous as it stands.  The article should restrict itself to decribing YEC, not refuting evolution...that is for another place.   
 
Also, you state statistics that most Americans believe this, and that most scientists dont, then go on to say that consensus doesnt make it so.  So, I guess if the Americans that were polled agree that YEC is true, that it is, and if most scientists agree that it is false, well, they be godless wizards, see Leviticus 20.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 21:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Also, you state statistics that most Americans believe this, and that most scientists dont, then go on to say that consensus doesnt make it so.  So, I guess if the Americans that were polled agree that YEC is true, that it is, and if most scientists agree that it is false, well, they be godless wizards, see Leviticus 20.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 21:04, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
* I am not a YEC so I am glad this article is locked.  Since I have nothing contribute to a Young Earth article, I may proceed to edit Old Earth articles without a fair and balanced rebuttal here.  [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 18:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
603

edits

Navigation menu