Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conservapedia proven right (view source)

Revision as of 17:08, November 20, 2011

403 bytes added ,  17:08, November 20, 2011
increase in frequency of large earthquakes, met with liberal denial but then tragically proven true; an outraged public asks why more precautions were not taken
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted [[liberals]] have ridiculed.  Examples include:
+
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup, even with respect to statements that dimwitted [[liberals]] have ridiculed.  Examples include:
    
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
Line 63: Line 63:  
|Oct. 11, 2011
 
|Oct. 11, 2011
 
|-
 
|-
−
|
+
|Sept. 20, 2011
−
|
+
|Large earthquakes are increasing in frequency.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=918691</ref>
−
|
+
|Ignorant [[liberal denial]], with tragic results.
−
|
+
|Earthquakes then repeatedly strike, causing unnecessary deaths and public outrage at the lack of precautionary measures.
 +
|October 2011
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,533

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/938782"

Navigation menu