Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
65 bytes added ,  18:24, November 20, 2011
→‎See also: explained what they have to do with each other
Line 29: Line 29:  
There is an academic controversy over whether proofs by contradiction (see also [[Excluded Middle]]) should be accepted qua proofs; either due to concerns regarding computability, or [[Intuitionist Mathematics]]. These are not necessarily held to be distinct concerns. Most mathematicians disregard any such controversy and accept proofs by contradiction.
 
There is an academic controversy over whether proofs by contradiction (see also [[Excluded Middle]]) should be accepted qua proofs; either due to concerns regarding computability, or [[Intuitionist Mathematics]]. These are not necessarily held to be distinct concerns. Most mathematicians disregard any such controversy and accept proofs by contradiction.
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
−
*[[Stolen concept]]
+
*[[Stolen concept]], a fallacy that can be exposed using a ''reductio ad absurdum''
 +
 
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Logic]]
 
[[Category:Logic]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu