Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Brandon McInerney (view source)

Revision as of 03:09, November 23, 2011

201 bytes added ,  03:09, November 23, 2011
→‎Discussion is welcome here: it not's true that the jury was hung on the false hate crime accusation. The jury was unanimous that this was not a hate crime.
Line 4: Line 4:  
:McInerney was falsely accused of a hate crime, and it looks like his trial (which he won a hung jury at) did not even hear all the evidence in his favor.  You're right that sexual harassment does not warrant murder, but no one claims it would.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:44, 22 November 2011 (EST)
 
:McInerney was falsely accused of a hate crime, and it looks like his trial (which he won a hung jury at) did not even hear all the evidence in his favor.  You're right that sexual harassment does not warrant murder, but no one claims it would.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:44, 22 November 2011 (EST)
 
::I think the jury was hung on the hate crime thing, not the actual crime.  Regardless, I think that in the end justice has been served.  McInerney is going to prison for murder.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:47, 22 November 2011 (EST)
 
::I think the jury was hung on the hate crime thing, not the actual crime.  Regardless, I think that in the end justice has been served.  McInerney is going to prison for murder.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:47, 22 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
:::No, it not's true that the jury was hung on the false hate crime accusation.  The jury was unanimous that this was not a hate crime.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:09, 22 November 2011 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,906

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/939682"

Navigation menu