Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 22:
Line 22: − − Conservapedia, unlike Wikipedia has no bias, for example if an article on [[abortion]] is written by someone who supports it, it will likely not be biased towards that viewpoint, only if from a conservative viewpoint. Line 31:
Line 29: − *[[Conservative bias]]
Reverted edits by Chistdude (talk) to last revision by Aschlafly
In works describing a potentially controversial topic, '''bias''' refers to the tendency of an author who holds a particular viewpoint to express that viewpoint (whether intentionally or subconsciously) in his work. This typically goes against the ideal of compendiums which are meant to be neutral, such as encyclopedias. For example, if an article on [[abortion]] is written by someone who supports it, it will likely be biased towards that viewpoint, and vice versa.
In works describing a potentially controversial topic, '''bias''' refers to the tendency of an author who holds a particular viewpoint to express that viewpoint (whether intentionally or subconsciously) in his work. This typically goes against the ideal of compendiums which are meant to be neutral, such as encyclopedias. For example, if an article on [[abortion]] is written by someone who supports it, it will likely be biased towards that viewpoint, and vice versa.
==History==
==History==
*[[Media bias]]
*[[Media bias]]
*[[Liberal bias]]
*[[Liberal bias]]
*[[Liberal quotient]]
*[[Liberal quotient]]
*[[Essay: Accuracy vs. neutrality on Conservapedia]]
*[[Essay: Accuracy vs. neutrality on Conservapedia]]