Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Looking for something that should be there under a theory, but not finding it there as predicted, is a counterexample.
Line 521: Line 521:  
:::And what exactly did I delete?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:42, 13 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::And what exactly did I delete?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:42, 13 November 2011 (EST)
 
Just wanted to add to this: When has <math>\Lambda</math> failed? It's a perfectly legitimate term in the EFE's, as csmcmillion has stated. The righthand side of it is (in <math>G=c=1</math> units) is <math>8 \pi T^{\alpha \beta }</math>. You need something on the left which is a measure of curvature, i.e., the Einstein tensor <math>G^{\alpha \beta}</math>. Why the Einstein tensor? Why not the Ricci tensor? Why not the scalar curvature times the metric? The reason is that the stress-energy tensor (<b>T</b>) has to have zero divergence: <math>\nabla_{\beta} T^{\alpha \beta} = 0 </math>. The Einstein tensor has zero divergence as well. But, we also have <math> \nabla_{\gamma} g^{\alpha \beta} = 0</math>. So we can safely add in <math>\Lambda g^{\alpha \beta}</math> to the left hand side of the EFE without violating local conservation of energy-momentum. Using this gives <math>G^{\alpha \beta}+\Lambda g^{\alpha \beta} = 8 \pi T^{\alpha \beta}. </math> [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 19:46, 15 November 2011 (EST)
 
Just wanted to add to this: When has <math>\Lambda</math> failed? It's a perfectly legitimate term in the EFE's, as csmcmillion has stated. The righthand side of it is (in <math>G=c=1</math> units) is <math>8 \pi T^{\alpha \beta }</math>. You need something on the left which is a measure of curvature, i.e., the Einstein tensor <math>G^{\alpha \beta}</math>. Why the Einstein tensor? Why not the Ricci tensor? Why not the scalar curvature times the metric? The reason is that the stress-energy tensor (<b>T</b>) has to have zero divergence: <math>\nabla_{\beta} T^{\alpha \beta} = 0 </math>. The Einstein tensor has zero divergence as well. But, we also have <math> \nabla_{\gamma} g^{\alpha \beta} = 0</math>. So we can safely add in <math>\Lambda g^{\alpha \beta}</math> to the left hand side of the EFE without violating local conservation of energy-momentum. Using this gives <math>G^{\alpha \beta}+\Lambda g^{\alpha \beta} = 8 \pi T^{\alpha \beta}. </math> [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 19:46, 15 November 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
== Reversion explained ==
 +
 +
The "The observed lack of curvature in overall space" is not an "unobserved" phenomenon.  Accordingly, it has been reverted along with the others.  Looking for something that should be there under a theory, but not finding it there as predicted, is a counterexample.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:50, 30 November 2011 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu