Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,206
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 152:
Line 152: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→ClimateGate 2.0: new section
==Notes==
==Notes==
<references/>
<references/>
== ClimateGate 2.0 ==
Here's a collection of articles and news stories covering the recent batch of [[Climategate#Climategate_Emails|climategate emails]], released November 2011.
* [http://news.investors.com/Article/592860/201111251803/new-study-casts-doubt-on-global-warming.htm More Proof That Climate Scientists Colluded to Lie to Us] - ''Global Warming Models Called Into Question By New Study'' - www.news.investors.com
* [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204452104577059830626002226.html Climategate 2.0] - ''A new batch of leaked emails again shows some leading scientists trying to smear opponents.'' - www.online.wsj.com
* [http://climaterealists.com/?id=8708 John O'Sullivan: CLIMATEGATE 2 Sensational Email Release: Durban Conference Derailed] - www.climaterealists.com
* [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100119495/climategate-2-0-the-not-nice-and-clueless-phil-jones/ Climategate 2.0: the not nice and clueless Phil Jones] - blogs.telegraph.co.uk
** [http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=8712 James Delingpole: Climategate 2.0: the most damning email of them all] - www.climaterealists.com
* [http://detnews.com/article/20111129/MIVIEW/111290379/Lacey--Climategate-2--The-Corruption-of-Science Lacey: Climategate 2, The Corruption of Science] - ''Professor Jim Lacey writes in National Review on Climategate 2''
I've been way busy lately, so I'm adding the links here until I get a chance to incorporate the context of 2.0 into the main [[ClimateGate]] page. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 14:00, 1 December 2011 (EST)