Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Atheism/archive20 (view source)
Revision as of 09:58, December 2, 2011
, 09:58, December 2, 2011→Link addition
Could somebody add a link to <nowiki>[[Definitions of Atheist and Agnostic]]</nowiki> to the "''See also:''" at the beginning of the [[Atheism#Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism|Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism]] section? I can't edit the page myself; I can only "view its source." --[[User:Ty|Ty]] 17:36, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
Could somebody add a link to <nowiki>[[Definitions of Atheist and Agnostic]]</nowiki> to the "''See also:''" at the beginning of the [[Atheism#Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism|Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism]] section? I can't edit the page myself; I can only "view its source." --[[User:Ty|Ty]] 17:36, 7 September 2011 (EDT)
:Done [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:16, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
:Done [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 08:16, 9 September 2011 (EDT)
== Definition ==
Just as an a quick aside should the main definition read "denial of the existence of <u>a</u> God and/or Gods?" [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:08, 14 November 2011 (EST)
:I would have made the change but it appears I can't. Anyone? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:00, 15 November 2011 (EST)
::Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. In addition, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST)
:::What Dawkins says is irrelevant - is atheism not the denial of all and any god(s)? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:40, 15 November 2011 (EST)
::::Max, you didn't respond adequately to my response to you and instead chose to merely focus on the last sentence of my response. This often seems to be your modus operandi and as a result, I am not interested in discussing the matter further with you. I have better things to do with my time than attempt to discuss things with a brick wall. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:27, 15 November 2011 (EST)
:::::Unjustifiable rudeness. Figures. You never addressed my point that atheism denies <u>all</u> gods but whatever. Nor do you adequately address anything anyone ever point out to you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:30, 15 November 2011 (EST)