| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | [[Category:Wikipedians on Conservapedia|Ed Poor]] | | [[Category:Wikipedians on Conservapedia|Ed Poor]] |
| − | <small>Archives: [[/archive 01|01]]</small> | + | <small>Archives: [[/archive 01|01]] [[/archive 02|02]] |
| − | | + | </small> |
| − | ==Contacting me==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I'll give out my phone number to just about anyone who emails me. Please use the "E-mail this user" link in the 'toolbox' on the left side of the page.
| |
| − | *Note that my cell phone died a few days ago, and I haven't replaced it yet.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I usually answer email within one day, but I don't guarantee this.
| |
| − | | |
| − | When I'm editing at Conservapedia, I usually answer messages on my talk pages within a few minutes.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Sometimes I hang out at #conservapedia on [[IRC]], and I can use Yahoo and AIM for private chat on request.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Quick links==
| |
| − | *[[Special:Imagelist]] - table of recently uploaded images
| |
| − | *[[Special:Ipblocklist]] - Use this to unblock a user.
| |
| − | *[[Special:Shortpages]]
| |
| − | *[[Conservapedia:Commonly misspelled words]]
| |
| − | *[[/to do list]] - anyone is free to edit this: add, delete, or prioritize as you see fit
| |
| − | | |
| − | __TOC__
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==About me==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Hi, my name is Ed Poor and I'm a former developer, admin & bureaucrat from Wikipedia.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | I know quite a bit about the internal workings of Wikipedia: the database structure, formatting, templates, dispute procedures, content and style guidelines; and, oh, yes, all the politics and gossip of the first few years.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Dpbsmith asked me to come over, so here I am. I'm finding the environment much more congenial.
| |
| − | | |
| − | My chief aim here is
| |
| − | to facilitate the highest standards of encyclopedia development.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I was one of the earliest members of the Wikipedia project (UserID #188). I helped institute the following practices or software features there:
| |
| − | [[Image:Ed11.jpg|left|thumb|Ed poor in Newark]]
| |
| − | *Marking edits as 'patrolled' (co-conceived with Maveric who in one marathon period personally checked '''every''' Wikipedia edit for vandalism!)
| |
| − | *Ability of blocked users to edit their own user talk page
| |
| − | *Community ban - i.e., increased authority for sysops to block a disruptive user
| |
| − | *The practice of bureaucrats "running" for office (I was the first one elected, when as a developer I could simply have granted myself the rights)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Pages I'm proud of there:
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_personal_remarks Wikipedia:Avoid personal remarks]
| |
| − | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_for_the_enemy Wikipedia:Writing for the enemy]
| |
| − | *{{wp|Wikipedia:Harmonious_editing_club}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Favorite contributors==
| |
| − | This is a partial list. Don't get all bent out of shape because I haven't placed your name here (yet). :-) And it's not in any particular order.
| |
| − | *{{user|TK}} - straight to the point
| |
| − | *{{user|MountainDew}} - refreshing, like a can of soda!
| |
| − | *{{user|RSchlafly}} - forthright
| |
| − | *{{user|Aschlafly}} - erudite
| |
| − | *{{user|Dpbsmith}} - out of sight!
| |
| − | *{{user|Hojimachong}} - all right!
| |
| − | *{{user|Sid 3050}} - a big help
| |
| − | *{{user|Jaques}} - a lot of interesting stuff
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==A new role==
| |
| − | | |
| − | To my surprise and pleasure, I was voted in as a sysop here - reportedly it was unanimous. Thank you for your support.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I believe that users who are here to contribute should get a helping hand, and those who cannot or will not make useful contributions should be shown to the door. But since, "His mercy is forever sure", I don't like applying infinite bans; it's always possible for a person to make up his mind to take a new direction. (I'm currently chewing some tough pills supplied by [[User:TK]], so watch out.)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I've unprotected a handful of pages and am watching them. I have hopes that eventually all content pages can be freely edited, once they reach a mature and stable state.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Welcome==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Welcome, I'm Dan. I see that you have made many great article improvements in your week here. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:45, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Thanks, Dan. I try. And I've learned a lot from watching you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:50, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Ideas I'm looking at==
| |
| − | *[[Japan]] and its use of women as sex objects
| |
| − | *''prawl'' = [[prowl]] + [[trawl]]
| |
| − | *[[Theory of Evolution]]
| |
| − | *#''the central premise of evolution remains more asserted than proved''
| |
| − | *#''where the first cell came from''
| |
| − | *#''the answers to some questions depend on the answers to others''
| |
| − | **[[/aspects of evolution]] - a draft about the terminological confusion
| |
| − | *[[origins debate]] = Creationism vs. "science" (i.e., materialism)
| |
| − | **Old Earth vs. Young Earth [http://www.sonlight.com/young_or_old_earth.html][http://www.answersincreation.org/index.htm]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Conservapedia as a [[think tank]]
| |
| − | *Flaws in [[Wikipedia]]
| |
| − | *Myk's gloomy prediction:[[User:Myk#Why conservapedia is doomed to fail|conservapedia is doomed to fail]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[Objectivity]]
| |
| − | *[[Science]] and [[scientist]]s
| |
| − | **How much trust do they deserve?
| |
| − | *[[Chilling effect]]
| |
| − | **''There is little present on this site that is in any way objective or scientific. The very fear that anything could get edited out for ideologic reasons puts a chill on what is published''
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Clarity: An encyclopedia should not use made-up, unclear terms. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&diff=81788&oldid=81737]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[/Morality]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Popularity
| |
| − | **of certain articles
| |
| − | **of the project as a whole
| |
| − | **Are they just laughing at us out there? (See 'liberal bias' below)
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Standards of conduct:
| |
| − | *#for sysops
| |
| − | *#*Not arbitrarily banning users
| |
| − | *#for ordinary users
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[Conservapedia:Reliability|Reliability]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Bias
| |
| − | **[[Liberal bias]]
| |
| − | **[[Conservative bias]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Collaboration
| |
| − | **Agreeing to disagree
| |
| − | **NPOV
| |
| − | **Compromise
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Registration
| |
| − | *:Registration is closed late at night and early morning (Eastern Time). It's open during the day and early evening. Also, you can email the webmaster or [[User:Aschlafly]] (he's at aol) for manual accounts.
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Leadership
| |
| − | **Should there be a "lead sysop"?
| |
| − | ***I'd be glad to follow [[User:TK|TerryK]]'s lead
| |
| − | **[[/Minion]]s [http://www.yourdictionary.com/ahd/m/m0316600.html]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[History of science]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Basis for inclusion of material
| |
| − | **Must be well-cited
| |
| − | **Are alternative ideas being censored?
| |
| − | | |
| − | *[[Politicized Science]] as related to:
| |
| − | **[[Eugenics]]
| |
| − | **[[Holocaust]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Smear terms [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&diff=75010&oldid=74978]
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Brag list==
| |
| − | <!-- from oldest 500 or 600 -->
| |
| − | Articles I wrote:
| |
| − | [[Upper West Side]],
| |
| − | [[kilometer]],
| |
| − | [[deduction]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | Articles to which I've made significant contributions:
| |
| − | [[germ theory of disease]],
| |
| − | [[microorganisms]],
| |
| − | [[Sun]],
| |
| − | [[liberal bias]],
| |
| − | [[global warming]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | Seeds I've planted:
| |
| − | [[ellipse]],
| |
| − | [[centroid]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | Templates I created:
| |
| − | *{{tl|Cn}} - 1 use
| |
| − | *{{tl|Who says}} - 3 uses
| |