Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 536:
Line 536: − +
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 01:13, December 3, 2011
, 01:13, December 3, 2011→lack of footnotes in article
If anyone wants to discuss this issue before I begin editing, I invite you to do so. --[[User:Virgil|Virgil]] 17:24, 26 November 2011 (EST)
If anyone wants to discuss this issue before I begin editing, I invite you to do so. --[[User:Virgil|Virgil]] 17:24, 26 November 2011 (EST)
== lack of footnotes in article ==
== lack of sufficient footnoting in the article ==
If memory serves, Andy's brother, Roger Schlafly, claimed that there was a claim or that there were claims made in this article which were not footnoted/sourced. The Conservapedia commandments declare you must declare your sources. The theory of relativity article is poorly footnoted in my estimation.
If memory serves, Andy's brother, Roger Schlafly, claimed that there was a claim or that there were claims made in this article which were not footnoted/sourced. The Conservapedia commandments declare you must declare your sources. The theory of relativity article is poorly footnoted in my estimation.