56
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 571:
Line 571: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 18:58, December 3, 2011
, 18:58, December 3, 2011→Deleted example to releativity
:::::::"If what you say is true, then we would have to get rid of this entire page because it invalidates every counter example" Why? Just because a theory is false overall, that doesn't mean that parts of it aren't true. Parts of Darwin's theory are true; living things DO inherit characteristics from their parents and those characteristics DO affect their chances of survival. Despite that, evolution is still false. --[[User:ClearView2011|ClearView2011]] 13:48, 3 December 2011 (EST)
:::::::"If what you say is true, then we would have to get rid of this entire page because it invalidates every counter example" Why? Just because a theory is false overall, that doesn't mean that parts of it aren't true. Parts of Darwin's theory are true; living things DO inherit characteristics from their parents and those characteristics DO affect their chances of survival. Despite that, evolution is still false. --[[User:ClearView2011|ClearView2011]] 13:48, 3 December 2011 (EST)
::::::::If it was removed because nuclear power stations exist, then surely it would invalidate every counter example too, right? If what you claim is correct and they do exist, then shouldn't this whole page be deleted?.