Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: +
Talk:Intelligent design (view source)
Revision as of 20:51, December 3, 2011
, 20:51, December 3, 2011→SETI: Thanks for feedback
at the end of section "The Capacity of Intelligent Causes" (pls.remove then "references" template at the end included in here just for illustrative purposes)--[[User:AK|AK]] 06:43, 3 December 2011 (EST)
at the end of section "The Capacity of Intelligent Causes" (pls.remove then "references" template at the end included in here just for illustrative purposes)--[[User:AK|AK]] 06:43, 3 December 2011 (EST)
::::I like the code part, but not a big fan of SETI. Will work to get code part in. can mention that SETI assumes evolution/abiogenesis which is wrong but coded information nevertheless meets SETI. I can work on this in 2012. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 06:56, 3 December 2011 (EST)
::::I like the code part, but not a big fan of SETI. Will work to get code part in. can mention that SETI assumes evolution/abiogenesis which is wrong but coded information nevertheless meets SETI. I can work on this in 2012. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 06:56, 3 December 2011 (EST)
:::::I'm not a big fan of SETI either, but the point is that they regard "the existence of coded information" as criterion to attribute signal to intelligent cause, and DNA and RNA sequences in cell are clearly passing this criterion, unless mainstream science references to genetic code should be denied.--[[User:AK|AK]] 15:51, 3 December 2011 (EST)