Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
hit "enter" too soon
Line 3: Line 3:  
Guilt by association is a tactic often used by [[liberal]] and [[leftist]] activist groups to smear [[conservative]]s (often, in an attempt to imply some nebulous connection of mainstream conservatives to an imagined threat from the "radical right").  Examples of liberal groups making frequent use of this tactic include [[MoveOn.org]], [[Daily Kos]], the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]], the [[Center for Democratic Renewal]], and [[Political Research Associates]].
 
Guilt by association is a tactic often used by [[liberal]] and [[leftist]] activist groups to smear [[conservative]]s (often, in an attempt to imply some nebulous connection of mainstream conservatives to an imagined threat from the "radical right").  Examples of liberal groups making frequent use of this tactic include [[MoveOn.org]], [[Daily Kos]], the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]], the [[Center for Democratic Renewal]], and [[Political Research Associates]].
   −
Guilt by association is a [[logical fallacy|fallacy]] of relevance because the mere fact that a disliked person accepts a position does not disprove that position.  The fallacy takes the following form:
+
Guilt by association is a [[logical fallacy|fallacy]] of relevance because the mere fact that a disliked person accepts a position says nothing about the truth of that position.  The fallacy takes the following form:
 
*A certain disagreeable person agrees with ''P''.
 
*A certain disagreeable person agrees with ''P''.
 
*Therefore, ''P'' is false.
 
*Therefore, ''P'' is false.
−
 
+
An extreme example of guilt by association is the [[reductio ad Hitlerum]].
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu