Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
342 bytes added ,  00:20, December 9, 2011
an example of this fallacy used by liberals to smear conservatives
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''Reductio ad Hitlerum''', also known as '''Argumentum ad Nazium''', the '''Hitler Card''',<ref>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adnazium.html Logical Fallacy: The Hitler Card]</ref> and '''Hitler Ate Sugar''',<ref>[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HitlerAteSugar Hitler Ate Sugar]</ref> is the [[fallacy]] that, where the subject expresses views that may have been held by [[Hitler]], the subject must of the same nature as Hitler.  It is am example of the [[Guilt by Association]] fallacy.
+
'''Reductio ad Hitlerum''', also known as '''Argumentum ad Nazium''', the '''Hitler Card''',<ref>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adnazium.html Logical Fallacy: The Hitler Card]</ref> and '''Hitler Ate Sugar''',<ref>[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HitlerAteSugar Hitler Ate Sugar]</ref> is the [[fallacy]] that, where the subject expresses views that may have been held by [[Hitler]], the subject must of the same nature as Hitler.  It is an example of the [[Guilt by Association]] fallacy and is commonly found in [[liberal]] [[smear campaign]]s against [[conservative]]s.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,107426,00.html Ad Comparing Bush to Hitler Gets Heat], from [[Fox News]]</ref>  It is commonly used even when Hitler demonstrably did not hold the view that is being attacked, although it is fallacious even if he did.
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
 
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu