Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 bytes added ,  19:56, December 9, 2011
m
Line 31: Line 31:     
==Omnipresence vs. Transcendence: Summary of the False Dichotomy==
 
==Omnipresence vs. Transcendence: Summary of the False Dichotomy==
−
If matter is non-quantized, then omnipresence of transcendence exists, since a non-quantized matter presupposes an omnipresent zero-point (a zero-point is similar to the [[Singularity]] of [[Relativity]]). If, on the other hand, matter is quantized, then, by a similar route of logic to that of non-quantized matter, omnipresence of transcendence exists. The only frame of reference in which omnipresence and transcendence are mutually exclusive is in the frame of reference of our everyday common sense practical view of the 'simple substantiality of matter,' and the 'simple non-substantiality of space'.
+
If matter is non-quantized, then omnipresence of transcendence exists, since a non-quantized matter presupposes an omnipresent zero-point (a zero-point is similar to the [[Singularity]] of [[Big Bang Cosmology]]). If, on the other hand, matter is quantized, then, by a similar route of logic to that of non-quantized matter, omnipresence of transcendence exists. The only frame of reference in which omnipresence and transcendence are mutually exclusive is in the frame of reference of our everyday common sense practical view of the 'simple substantiality of matter,' and the 'simple non-substantiality of space'.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568

edits

Navigation menu