161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 537:
Line 537: + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 23:05, December 9, 2011
, 23:05, December 9, 2011→Reversion explained
: If you want to be strict about examples being counter to relativity theory, then you would have to eliminate everything on the list. To be a true counterexample, there should be some relativity textbook that gives the example as something that cannot happen, and then some proof that it does happen. But there are no sources saying that for any of the items. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:19, 4 December 2011 (EST)
: If you want to be strict about examples being counter to relativity theory, then you would have to eliminate everything on the list. To be a true counterexample, there should be some relativity textbook that gives the example as something that cannot happen, and then some proof that it does happen. But there are no sources saying that for any of the items. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 21:19, 4 December 2011 (EST)
[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]], I have to say I'm at a loss here. You've restored items that you yourself have said shouldn't be listed under counterexamples (i.e. paradoxes and anomalies), plus an item concerning practical upshots that the talk page seems in wide agreement on, plus an obvious duplicate. and all without explanation. Please take at least as much time to explain your reversals as I have into explaining the reasons for my edits. --[[User:QPR|QPR]] 18:05, 9 December 2011 (EST)
== Deleted example to releativity ==
== Deleted example to releativity ==