Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
109 bytes added ,  02:17, December 13, 2011
m
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
The original intent, when first expounded by [[Jimbo Wales]] and [[Larry Sanger]], was to prevent any article from presenting exclusively one point of view on any controversial subject. However, influential cliques found that they could suppress minority viewpoints with the "undue weight" provision. The members of these cliques would claim that by giving attention to a "fringe" viewpoint, an article would give "equal validity" to POV. In practice, this functioned the same as University [[speech codes]] to prevent opposing viewpoints from being described fairly - which directly contradicts NPOV.
 
The original intent, when first expounded by [[Jimbo Wales]] and [[Larry Sanger]], was to prevent any article from presenting exclusively one point of view on any controversial subject. However, influential cliques found that they could suppress minority viewpoints with the "undue weight" provision. The members of these cliques would claim that by giving attention to a "fringe" viewpoint, an article would give "equal validity" to POV. In practice, this functioned the same as University [[speech codes]] to prevent opposing viewpoints from being described fairly - which directly contradicts NPOV.
    +
Conservapedia has no such policy, and only accepts views which are free of bias to these [[liberal]] ideas.
    
[[category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[category:Wikipedia]]
 
[[category:Censorship]]
 
[[category:Censorship]]
121

edits

Navigation menu