3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
Talk:Video game industry (view source)
Revision as of 01:00, December 15, 2011
, 01:00, December 15, 2011→Concerns
The way this article is written, it seems to imply that "terrorism" is a "liberal value." I sincerely hope I am mistaken here. [[User:Jessica87|Jessica87]] 17:48, 13 August 2011 (EDT)
The way this article is written, it seems to imply that "terrorism" is a "liberal value." I sincerely hope I am mistaken here. [[User:Jessica87|Jessica87]] 17:48, 13 August 2011 (EDT)
The criticism of Command and Conquer's Existance of communist ideals is not a primary concern for criticism. As much as it contains communist values, which you can see through the many Premiers there are Capitalist and American values to contradict them. Both the Communist and Capitalist characters appear as antagonist, the communist one more so than the other. The communist character of RA3 chooses to betray the player, while the American President sees fit to destroy Moscow. Equally, in Command and Conquer Generals, while you are capable of playing as a terrorist or Chinese faction, the USA also exists with many pro-American undertones. US units reiterate pro-American statements, like: "Preserving freedom." "Protecting our People." "It's the right thing to do." Therefore, I am removing Red Alert from the list.
== My Project ==
== My Project ==