I'm confused by the inclusion of a quote regarding darwinism and evolution at the introduction paragraph of the article. I've read a number of sources relating to the first world war, and only on the conservapedia page have I heard this vague reference to darwinism. I don't feel it's necessary, as it really was not a cause of WW1. Entangling alliances are by far the more important factor. Frankly, I think the current attempt to link it with evolution appears a desperate grasping at straws. {{unsigned|JasonN}} | I'm confused by the inclusion of a quote regarding darwinism and evolution at the introduction paragraph of the article. I've read a number of sources relating to the first world war, and only on the conservapedia page have I heard this vague reference to darwinism. I don't feel it's necessary, as it really was not a cause of WW1. Entangling alliances are by far the more important factor. Frankly, I think the current attempt to link it with evolution appears a desperate grasping at straws. {{unsigned|JasonN}} |