Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,949
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: − +
Richard Dawkins and agnosticism (view source)
Revision as of 01:35, December 21, 2011
, 01:35, December 21, 2011→Richard Dawkins 2006 interview with Alister McGrath
...all life, all intelligence, all creativity and all ‘design’ anywhere in the universe is the direct or indirect product of Darwinian natural selection...Design cannot precede evolution and therefore cannot underlie the universe.<ref>http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/2543431/is-richard-dawkins-still-evolving.thtml</ref>}}
...all life, all intelligence, all creativity and all ‘design’ anywhere in the universe is the direct or indirect product of Darwinian natural selection...Design cannot precede evolution and therefore cannot underlie the universe.<ref>http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/2543431/is-richard-dawkins-still-evolving.thtml</ref>}}
== Richard Dawkins 2006 interview with Alister McGrath ==
== Richard Dawkins 2006 interview with Alister McGrath ==
[[Image:Carl weiland.jpg|thumbnail|150px|right|Dr. [[Carl Wieland]] is the Managing Director of Creation Ministries International ]]
[[Creation Ministries International]] reported:
[[Creation Ministries International]] reported:
{{cquote|A correspondent kindly let us know of a [[BBC]] television interview with Richard Dawkins which was first broadcast in Britain in September 2006, shortly after he’d published his latest book The God Delusion. During that interview, Dawkins let slip a comment which, on the face of it, seems to be an amazing softening in his (formerly?) scoffing disdain for the idea that a ‘Supremely Intelligent Being’ is behind the laws of the universe.
{{cquote|A correspondent kindly let us know of a [[BBC]] television interview with Richard Dawkins which was first broadcast in Britain in September 2006, shortly after he’d published his latest book The God Delusion. During that interview, Dawkins let slip a comment which, on the face of it, seems to be an amazing softening in his (formerly?) scoffing disdain for the idea that a ‘Supremely Intelligent Being’ is behind the laws of the universe.