Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
169 bytes added ,  15:31, December 23, 2011
→‎POVERTY: new section
Line 100: Line 100:  
== Good article ==
 
== Good article ==
 
I don't find any negative tone in it, but does get to the point of discussing things about Mexico without being wordy or full of spin. The government section turned out not to be condemning the government as much, after all do many conservatives blame the country's problems on the way the Mexican tradition of democracy or politics as usual? I often heard Mexico was not only an one-party state from 1920 to 1994, but the PRI had a clearly socialist revolutionary stance under an elitist caste whom used propaganda that the "people" rule Mexico when in fact the majority of them had low living standards or conditions. + [[User:Getitstraight|Getitstraight]] 15:45, 14 December 2009 (EST)
 
I don't find any negative tone in it, but does get to the point of discussing things about Mexico without being wordy or full of spin. The government section turned out not to be condemning the government as much, after all do many conservatives blame the country's problems on the way the Mexican tradition of democracy or politics as usual? I often heard Mexico was not only an one-party state from 1920 to 1994, but the PRI had a clearly socialist revolutionary stance under an elitist caste whom used propaganda that the "people" rule Mexico when in fact the majority of them had low living standards or conditions. + [[User:Getitstraight|Getitstraight]] 15:45, 14 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== POVERTY ==
 +
 +
Poverty is one of the biggest issues the Mexican government has and not a single mention of it is found in the article. [[User:Ronaldperez|Ronaldperez]]

Navigation menu