Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 177: Line 177:     
*As you might have been noticing, there is more of a push on here to discourage their placement, in favor of short, factual and concise entries, over verbose and lenghty ones.  Templates are most certainly not encouraged here, and when found on questionable articles, removed.  I actually see the ability to place templates on articles restricted here, to Sysop's and above soon. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
*As you might have been noticing, there is more of a push on here to discourage their placement, in favor of short, factual and concise entries, over verbose and lenghty ones.  Templates are most certainly not encouraged here, and when found on questionable articles, removed.  I actually see the ability to place templates on articles restricted here, to Sysop's and above soon. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 00:43, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Wikipedia places stubs on almost anything that is short.  But concise entries are ''better'' than the wordy, overly verbose entries that dominate Wikipedia.  it seems that a high percentage of entries on Wikipedia have "stubs" placed on them.  Who wants to be distracted by that?  It's silly and, as TK says, we don't want them here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:03, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,210

edits

Navigation menu