Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,825
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 419:
Line 419: + + + + + − + − + − + − − Conservapedia, launched on November 21, 2006, has become one of the most amusing and unsavoury websites on the internet. Initially set up as a right wing alternative to Wikipedia, it rapidly gained notoriety as bastion of ignorance, religious fanaticism and heavy censorship. − − Most visitors believed ‘conservapedia’ was a crudely written parody site – but it soon became clear it was in fact ‘the real deal’. − − One event which brought conservapedia to greater public awareness was Andy Schafly’s attempt to refute Richard Lenski’s research. ( search ‘conservapediahasalittlehan’ ). Richard Lenski’s response is now considered one of the finest put-downs in the history of the internet. It also led to Danth’s Law (also known as Parker’s Law) mentioned in the British conservative newspaper, ‘the daily telegraph’. ( search ‘Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe’). − − However, Andy isn’t the star of the show. That accolade goes to the user known simply as user: conservative. He claims to be a mysterious entity but outside conservapedia, he is known as a failed writer called Ken ^DE_MYER^. Ironically on the website that calls itself ‘the trustworthy encyclopaedia’, this user’s real surname is a banned term! (Hence the inserted characters!) Ken is also mentioned in the telegraph article. − − Ken’s ‘articles’ have to be read to be believed. He obviously has an unhealthy obsession with ‘bestiality’. (So much for the family friendly environment!) − − Please feel free to copy and paste rather than blank and ‘nowiki’. − − Happy holidays to all our fans. _J^E^N^S^E^N_ − − The VC! Campaign has smashed the QE! Campaign into dust! − − P.s. Poor taj – don’t you realise that cp will not tolerate any polite, intelligent and informed discussion! − − − − − − − == conservapedia – Embarrassing America since 2006! == − − Conservapedia, launched on November 21, 2006, has become one of the most amusing and unsavoury websites on the internet. Initially set up as a right wing alternative to Wikipedia, it rapidly gained notoriety as bastion of ignorance, religious fanaticism and heavy censorship. − − Most visitors believed ‘conservapedia’ was a crudely written parody site – but it soon became clear it was in fact ‘the real deal’. − − One event which brought conservapedia to greater public awareness was Andy Schafly’s attempt to refute Richard Lenski’s research. ( search ‘conservapediahasalittlehan’ ). Richard Lenski’s response is now considered one of the finest put-downs in the history of the internet. It also led to Danth’s Law (also known as Parker’s Law) mentioned in the British conservative newspaper, ‘the daily telegraph’. ( search ‘Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe’). − − However, Andy isn’t the star of the show. That accolade goes to the user known simply as user: conservative. He claims to be a mysterious entity but outside conservapedia, he is known as a failed writer called Ken ^DE_MYER^. Ironically on the website that calls itself ‘the trustworthy encyclopaedia’, this user’s real surname is a banned term! (Hence the inserted characters!) Ken is also mentioned in the telegraph article. − − Ken’s ‘articles’ have to be read to be believed. He obviously has an unhealthy obsession with ‘bestiality’. (So much for the family friendly environment!) − − Please feel free to copy and paste rather than blank and ‘nowiki’. − − Happy holidays to all our fans. _J^E^N^S^E^N_ − − The VC! Campaign has smashed the QE! Campaign into dust! − − P.s. Poor taj – don’t you realise that cp will not tolerate any polite, intelligent and informed discussion!
Undo revision 949493 by JbrattsBallz (talk)
I apologize if it appeared that I was trying to censor you, especially since a troll had previously made an edit that contained a similar change. My concern was whether that information was family friendly, but I guess you see differently. Again, I apologize if it seemed like I was being nonconstructive. I look forward to working with you. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:25, 19 December 2011 (EST)
I apologize if it appeared that I was trying to censor you, especially since a troll had previously made an edit that contained a similar change. My concern was whether that information was family friendly, but I guess you see differently. Again, I apologize if it seemed like I was being nonconstructive. I look forward to working with you. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 23:25, 19 December 2011 (EST)
== Vandals ==
You get these guys all the time, don't you? Liberals are out there all the time trying to censor voices other than their own....and they try and accuse conservatives of intolerance? Good work blocking those clowns :)!--[[User:GFitz|GFitz]] 12:00, 27 December 2011 (EST)
==Need to delete some pages==
Hi JPatt, I made a request in the [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]. While I edited, I have seen a few empty categories plus I made some test pages ([[User:PhilipN/Template:City]] [[User:PhilipN/Template:Music]] [[User:PhilipN/Fake City]] [[User:PhilipN/Fake Band]]).
Do you think it might be possible to grant me the delete rights or could someone please delete those pages for me ? Thanks. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 23:26, 27 December 2011 (EST)
==Thanks for the block !==
It's just frustrating to see those vandals messing with our articles.
== conservapedia – Embarrassing America since 2006! ==
:Just a bunch of kiddies, vandalism should decrease once school starts up again.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:55, 29 December 2011 (EST)