| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Aging remains a mystery to science. What causes it? What ''is'' it? How does one define it?
| + | Throughout history, many theories of aging have existed. Currently, modern empirical theories of aging are categorized into two groups: stochastic damage-based theories of aging and programmed theories of aging |
| | | | |
| − | Logically, aging is simply a progression to [[Heaven]] or [[Hell]]. It is nothing more or less. The past merely represents points further away from one's destination, while the future is simply points closer to one's destination.
| + | These groups however, are not strict categories as programmed theories of aging may also incorporate elements of damage based theories. |
| | + | Especially relevant theories known to the public include the free radical theory of aging as well as aging determined by genetics. However, recently empirical evidence of a hormesis effect by free radicals as well as conflicting data weaken the free radical theory. |
| | | | |
| − | This model for aging easily explains enigmas that are otherwise puzzling, including:
| + | Additional questions include: |
| | | | |
| − | *why conversion becomes more difficult as one grows older
| + | What genetic pathways might influence aging? |
| − | *why criminals often commit worse and worse crimes
| + | How does the evolutionary theory of aging affect programmed theories of aging? |
| − | *why so many Christian martyrs have willing accepted earthly death
| |
| − | *why aging does not necessarily make one more wise or just
| |
| − | | |
| − | (add more)
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:Mystery]]
| |