Changes

:::Upon further review, we see oppostiion to American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy really is not limited to just recent years; we have more less successfully defined American Liberalism as equivalent to European Socialism, and in the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] we have only just began to show [[Marxism]] stands in direct opposition to universally recognized [[human rights]].  Then in reviewing US history, likewise we see Liberals '''actively''' opposed human rights and democracy for the peoples of Nicaragua and El Salvador in the 1980s, and the peoples of South Vietnam and Cambodia in the 1960s and 70s.  So there is ample evidence to support the claim.  And various so-called "liberal" editors here in Conservapedia openly state women were better off without the vote under Iraqi fascism than being supported by the United States in a Constitutional democracy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:11, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Upon further review, we see oppostiion to American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy really is not limited to just recent years; we have more less successfully defined American Liberalism as equivalent to European Socialism, and in the [[Universal Declaration of Human Rights]] we have only just began to show [[Marxism]] stands in direct opposition to universally recognized [[human rights]].  Then in reviewing US history, likewise we see Liberals '''actively''' opposed human rights and democracy for the peoples of Nicaragua and El Salvador in the 1980s, and the peoples of South Vietnam and Cambodia in the 1960s and 70s.  So there is ample evidence to support the claim.  And various so-called "liberal" editors here in Conservapedia openly state women were better off without the vote under Iraqi fascism than being supported by the United States in a Constitutional democracy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:11, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

* [[User:RobS|RobS]], why did you remove the link to Goerge W. Bush opposing nation building, that republicans are isolationist at times, too? It was an position that got him votes in 2000, probably the winning ones, so why hide it? Nothing to be ashamed of. Furthermore, we went trough the whole "opposition" thing about 3 times in the last month. At some point you kind of understood that liberals do not believe the Bush, Nixon, Reagan when they claimed they did/do it to free the people from oppression. Just like conservatives didn't believe Clinton when he intervened in Sudan.

* [[User:RobS|RobS]], why did you remove the link to Goerge W. Bush opposing nation building, and the pint that republicans are isolationist at times, too? Opposing nation building was an position that got him votes in 2000, probably the winning ones, so why hide it? Nothing to be ashamed of. Furthermore, we went trough the whole "opposition" thing about 3 times in the last month. At some point you kind of understood that liberals do not believe the Bushs, Nixons, Reagans when these claimed they did/do it to free the people from oppression. Just like conservatives didn't believe Clinton when he intervened in Sudan.

* Furthermore, I don't believe that you lack the knowledge to distinguish between European socialism, and the Democratic party.   

* Furthermore, I don't believe that you lack the knowledge to distinguish between European socialism, and the Democratic party.   

* Finally, since the article is locked, it seems like you are abusing your sysop privileges, by push controvesial edits. The previous formulation was a compromise, after weeks of disccussion. It changed from  ''support for human rights'' to ''support'', back to ''opposition'', back to ''support'', until we agreed that Liberal just don't get it, that Bush is doing it for human rights.  You are showing a lot of disrespect to a long discussion, to which contributed a lot yourself. [[User:Order]] 9 April , 18:20 (AEST)

* Finally, since the article is locked, it seems like you are abusing your sysop privileges, by push controvesial edits. The previous formulation was a compromise, after weeks of disccussion. It changed from  ''support for human rights'' to ''support'', back to ''opposition'', back to ''support'', until we agreed that Liberal just don't get it, that Bush is doing it for human rights.  You are showing a lot of disrespect to a long discussion, to which contributed a lot yourself. [[User:Order]] 9 April , 18:20 (AEST)