Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − − − Ed Poor-- Nice job on the political spectrum page. Conciseness is next to godliness. I didnt appreciate being called a weasel... but your editing was good. − − I still support separate pages for left/right/ and spectrum. The left/right pages are now very concise. But I think we should leave them open for people to expand on. --[[User:Redblue|Redblue]] 07:55, 9 April 2007 (EDT) − − :LOL, the weaselly part I cut out was (I think) actually written by me. Lemme go check. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:58, 9 April 2007 (EDT) − − ::*Nope. It was Mathematica: ''It has been commonly pointed out that ...'' [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&diff=93110&oldid=89518] − − ::Doesnt really matter who wrote it... the current version strikes me as clearer. --[[User:Redblue|Redblue]] 07:59, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
move to talk
But I didn't see the anti-elitism creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right. My only worry about this place is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.
But I didn't see the anti-elitism creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right. My only worry about this place is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.