Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8,171 bytes removed ,  21:17, January 6, 2012
m
Reverted edits by JenDMer (talk) to last revision by Taj
Line 1: Line 1: −
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
+
== Archive 2008 ==
−
 
+
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]
−
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
  −
 
  −
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
  −
 
  −
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
  −
 
  −
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
  −
 
  −
May the gods bless your ignorance,
  −
 
  −
Your servant,
  −
 
  −
JsEsNsSeEsN
  −
 
  −
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better!
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
  −
 
  −
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
  −
 
  −
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
  −
 
  −
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
  −
 
  −
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
  −
 
  −
May the gods bless your ignorance,
  −
 
  −
Your servant,
  −
 
  −
JsEsNsSeEsN
  −
 
  −
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
  −
 
  −
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
  −
 
  −
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
  −
 
  −
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
  −
 
  −
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
  −
 
  −
May the gods bless your ignorance,
  −
 
  −
Your servant,
  −
 
  −
JsEsNsSeEsN
  −
 
  −
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
  −
 
  −
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
  −
 
  −
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
  −
 
  −
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.
  −
 
  −
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
  −
 
  −
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
  −
 
  −
May the gods bless your ignorance,
  −
 
  −
Your servant,
  −
 
  −
JsEsNsSeEsN
  −
 
  −
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
 
  −
== Conservapedia – We’ve love you guys, but sorry…  ==
  −
 
  −
We might as well tell you, we been running a campaign for the last three years to push ‘consevapedia’ more and more into the ‘loony’ right. We have succeeded – beyond all hopes!
  −
 
  −
We did worry at first during your early days that ‘cp’ may take a hold on the public consciousness and quickly become a viral success. So we engaged in an extensive operation to gradually edit and corrupt ‘cp’ until the articles became so irrational and insulting that no-one would take any information stated as fact on this seriously. And attract high numbers of visitors who merely want to mock.  
  −
 
  −
Ken has been our greatest asset. Andy, you know deep down that user::conservative pollutes and violates the honest intentions of this website but attracts many views. He’s not one of ours but ‘the jury’ is still out on whether or not he’s a parodist. We have, however, noted that lately there has been a definite decrease in the quality of his articles. Especially his support of the ‘question evolution!! Campaign’ – the most recent links to the videos of the ‘Cecil B. DeMille’ of creationism were highly embarrassing!
  −
 
  −
We want you to carry on…  but under a constant threat of attack and with an increased sense of paranoia. We want to ensure that ‘conservapedia’ continues to be a bastion of anti-science, anti-reason, anti-education and anti-intellectualism.
  −
 
  −
May the gods bless your ignorance,
  −
 
  −
Your servant,
  −
 
  −
JsEsNsSeEsN
  −
 
  −
p.s. Andy – is this the website you really wanted?  We liberal atheists couldn’t wished for better! And we always look at recent changes.
  −
 
      
== Archive 2009 ==
 
== Archive 2009 ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924

edits

Navigation menu