Block, SkipCaptcha, rollback
131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + + + +
Talk:Age of the Earth (view source)
Revision as of 23:32, January 10, 2012
, 23:32, January 10, 2012→Decay rates, again: new section
:It is obviously "implausible" because the universe is cooling over time, which would cause decay rates to change. It's no more possible for decay rates to remain constant than it would be for a sun to remain constant in energy.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:43, 30 December 2011 (EST)
:It is obviously "implausible" because the universe is cooling over time, which would cause decay rates to change. It's no more possible for decay rates to remain constant than it would be for a sun to remain constant in energy.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:43, 30 December 2011 (EST)
== Decay rates, again ==
Do we discuss anything here or is everything too scared of the 90/10 rule to bother? In changing "unreliable" to "imprecise", I took the time to try to explain in the edit summary why I was doing so yet it seems others can't actually be bothered to explain why they disagree with the change. Once it's simply "Unnecessary Edit" and now you can apparently just indicate you agree with someone else by stating "Consensus". It would be nice to at least have the opportunity of trying to understand the objections to the change. I do wonder if I'd be wasting my time expanding on my reasoning. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 18:32, 10 January 2012 (EST)