Changes

==Block reason==

==Block reason==

You have been blocked for subverting the spam filter and your inappropriate comments have been reverted. Remember, this is a "family friendly" encyclopedia and you must follow these rules. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 17:17, 5 July 2008 (EDT)

You have been blocked for subverting the spam filter and your inappropriate comments have been reverted. Remember, this is a "family friendly" encyclopedia and you must follow these rules. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS^talk]] 17:17, 5 July 2008 (EDT)

== Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality? ==

== Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality? ==

I thought you'd like to know that "Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality?" is back open for business, at Rat ion alWiki. --[[User:Martina|Martina]] 17:30, 29 October 2008 (EDT)

I thought you'd like to know that "Debate: Do we put enough emphasis on homosexuality?" is back open for business, at [removed by JonM]. --[[User:Martina|Martina]] 17:30, 29 October 2008 (EDT)

:Doesn't surprise me. I started it to draw attention to the apparent facination Conservapedia contributors have with homosexuality, and it's exactly the type of thing 'that wiki' would mock them for. Also, Aschlafly... this is my talk page. Don't just revert someone's comment before I have even had a chance to see it, that was very confusing. If Martina broke a rule (Are users forbidden from acknowledging the existance of other wikis?), then at least have the manners to say in exactly what way while deleting her comment. It's very annoying when an admin acts without stateing which rule was broken - I still cannot understand which of my edits to the Satan article were mistaken for parody. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 15:36, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

:Doesn't surprise me. I started it to draw attention to the apparent facination Conservapedia contributors have with homosexuality, and it's exactly the type of thing 'that wiki' would mock them for. Also, Aschlafly... this is my talk page. Don't just revert someone's comment before I have even had a chance to see it, that was very confusing. If Martina broke a rule (Are users forbidden from acknowledging the existance of other wikis?), then at least have the manners to say in exactly what way while deleting her comment. It's very annoying when an admin acts without stateing which rule was broken - I still cannot understand which of my edits to the Satan article were mistaken for parody. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 15:36, 30 October 2008 (EDT)