SkipCaptcha
445
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + +
Conservapedia talk:Writing plan (view source)
Revision as of 04:29, January 11, 2012
, 04:29, January 11, 2012no edit summary
:::Let me be clear on this, it appears a recent block was ''for'' failure to follow instructions to submit a writing plan, whereas the idea is supposed to be submit a writing plan to get unblocked, I think. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Let me be clear on this, it appears a recent block was ''for'' failure to follow instructions to submit a writing plan, whereas the idea is supposed to be submit a writing plan to get unblocked, I think. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
::::That may be the idea, but has anyone actually submitted a writing plan, ever? If not it seems this might not be a very effective policy (or it's extremely effective, if the goal is just to give a premise for blocking) --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 15:10, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
::::That may be the idea, but has anyone actually submitted a writing plan, ever? If not it seems this might not be a very effective policy (or it's extremely effective, if the goal is just to give a premise for blocking) --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 15:10, 6 August 2011 (EDT)
==Revive==
This seems great, especially if a large, potentially controversial article is added. I would like to see it used more.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 23:29, 10 January 2012 (EST)