64
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + +
Talk:Amnesty International (view source)
Revision as of 23:24, January 11, 2012
, 23:24, January 11, 2012→Biased against AI?: new section
:::::The selection bias is ''related'' to democracy & freedom of speech because those countries are where AI suggests it can have the biggest impact, as I outlined above, but this is not a bias against democracy. Selection bias isn't a self-explanatory term, but it could be explained in the text. However, if you don't want to use it as a section title, I think your suggested title of "Bias against democratic countries" is satrisfactory, as this is what much of the the controversy/criticism boils down to, but please keep in place the last paragraph mentioning accusations of pro-American/British bias too. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 11:43, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::The selection bias is ''related'' to democracy & freedom of speech because those countries are where AI suggests it can have the biggest impact, as I outlined above, but this is not a bias against democracy. Selection bias isn't a self-explanatory term, but it could be explained in the text. However, if you don't want to use it as a section title, I think your suggested title of "Bias against democratic countries" is satrisfactory, as this is what much of the the controversy/criticism boils down to, but please keep in place the last paragraph mentioning accusations of pro-American/British bias too. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 11:43, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
== Biased against AI? ==
This article is heavily biased against AI. It makes the organization seem to be a mainly Anti-American leftist anti-Israel organization, which cannot be farther from the truth. It is one of the few organizations that are very vocal in its criticism against the current authoritarian and anti-American regime of China, and should be noted as such. AI has no agenda except to promote human rights everywhere in the world. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 18:24, 11 January 2012 (EST)