Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 186:
Line 186: +
Talk:Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 23:49, January 13, 2012
, 23:49, January 13, 2012→Open question to readers of this page
:*And when those boys and girls come here for more ammunition, you fail to provide it. Instead you are playing word games and engage in senseless ridicule.
:*And when those boys and girls come here for more ammunition, you fail to provide it. Instead you are playing word games and engage in senseless ridicule.
:[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:49, 13 January 2012 (EST)
:[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:49, 13 January 2012 (EST)
::::I see that you could not come up with bona fide fields of science that have uncomfortable "trade secrets" that they hide from the public. I find that very telling. "The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persist as the trade secret of paleontology." - Stephen Jay Gould, Harvard paleontologist. The reason why Darwinism has such a bad reputation in the world is that the field is infested with shysters promoting it. That reputation is not going away and shysters like RudrichBoucher and Darwinist women "pastors" who "bless" homosexual "marrriages" endorsing Darwinism exacerbates this significant problem. Plus, the [[Question evolution! campaign]] will sully this horrid reputation further as Darwinists cannot satisfactorily answer the 15 questions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:49, 13 January 2012 (EST)