378
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 374:
Line 374: + +
Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant? (view source)
Revision as of 16:31, April 9, 2007
, 16:31, April 9, 2007→What about the big contradiction?
So, is clear enough that according to the New Testament, with regard to religious matters not ''all'' of the Old Testament is to be considered the infallible word of God. But nothing in the New Testament clearly catalogs ''which'' parts of the Old Testament have been superseded, leaving this to be a matter of interpretation—and the actual interpretation varies widely, depending on who is doing the interpretation. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
So, is clear enough that according to the New Testament, with regard to religious matters not ''all'' of the Old Testament is to be considered the infallible word of God. But nothing in the New Testament clearly catalogs ''which'' parts of the Old Testament have been superseded, leaving this to be a matter of interpretation—and the actual interpretation varies widely, depending on who is doing the interpretation. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:Moreover, there is ''no'' commandment in the OT saying 'Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.' That is taken from the Essenes' ''Manual of Discipline'' - which, of course, opens up a whole new can of worms... --[[User:Petrus|Petrus]] 12:31, 9 April 2007 (EDT)