Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 191:
Line 191: + + + +
Talk:Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 08:25, January 14, 2012
, 08:25, January 14, 2012→Open question to readers of this page
:There are evolutionist responses to each of the 15 questions. One creationist rebuttal has been given, and a calm discussion followed without accusations and name-calling. I like that format, and wish to continue with such discussion. --[[User:RedGoliath|RedGoliath]] 01:16, 14 January 2012 (GMT)
:There are evolutionist responses to each of the 15 questions. One creationist rebuttal has been given, and a calm discussion followed without accusations and name-calling. I like that format, and wish to continue with such discussion. --[[User:RedGoliath|RedGoliath]] 01:16, 14 January 2012 (GMT)
::''The reason why Darwinism has such a bad reputation in the world is that the field is infested with shysters promoting it. That reputation is not going away and shysters like RudrichBoucher and Darwinist women "pastors" who "bless" homosexual "marrriages" endorsing Darwinism exacerbates this significant problem.''
::Then you should perhaps not try to counter ''Darwinism'' on scientific reasons, but start a smear campaign to sully its reputation (a tactic often used by liberals). Oh wait, that's exactly what you are doing.
::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:25, 14 January 2012 (EST)