Block, SkipCaptcha, rollback
131
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
→Copy-pasted: +cmt
From the section '''History''' to '''Religion in Vancouver''' is taken from the Wikipedia's "Vancouver" section '''Demographics''' and the 2nd paragraph of the article. Is it okay to leave it like this?<br />
From the section '''History''' to '''Religion in Vancouver''' is taken from the Wikipedia's "Vancouver" section '''Demographics''' and the 2nd paragraph of the article. Is it okay to leave it like this?<br />
The religion data is out-dated. There are Census results for 2006. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 15:41, 23 December 2011 (EST)
The religion data is out-dated. There are Census results for 2006. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 15:41, 23 December 2011 (EST)
:JonM suggests that the content on Wikipedia was copied from "the website of vancouver" but it's not even a month since this was added and the link to the Vancouver website doesn't seem to work and I can't find the content anywhere on the website. Even if this was on the Vancouver website, what would be the copyright situation there? It doesn't look like it's in the public domain. [[User:Adambro|Adambro]] 15:16, 15 January 2012 (EST)