Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 157: Line 157:     
Teji, the statement does not claim that the theory of relativity supports moral relativity, but merely that supporters of moral relativity seized upon the theory of relativity to justify their views.  "Advocates of moral relativity seized on the theory of relativity to legitimize their views.[3] Historians such as Paul Johnson wrote about how the theory of relativity caused a sea change, justified or not, in 20th century thought." That statement is correct and should not be deleted.  Read it, and reread it, and only comment further here if you can provide something that specifically refutes that statement.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:18, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Teji, the statement does not claim that the theory of relativity supports moral relativity, but merely that supporters of moral relativity seized upon the theory of relativity to justify their views.  "Advocates of moral relativity seized on the theory of relativity to legitimize their views.[3] Historians such as Paul Johnson wrote about how the theory of relativity caused a sea change, justified or not, in 20th century thought." That statement is correct and should not be deleted.  Read it, and reread it, and only comment further here if you can provide something that specifically refutes that statement.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:18, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:It is in the wrong place.  The statement is clearly about [[Moral relativity]].  This statement is also correct: ''Jesus is God'', does it belong in this article?  No.
71

edits

Navigation menu