1,695
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
Debate:Fallacy of Interpretations (view source)
Revision as of 17:45, April 9, 2007
, 17:45, April 9, 2007no edit summary
:That's assuming all humans are not infallible. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 13:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:That's assuming all humans are not infallible. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 13:42, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
::Show me the infallible human being. And don't say Jesus, he doesn't count.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 13:44, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
::Show me the infallible human being. And don't say Jesus, he doesn't count.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 13:44, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
:::I might not be able to, but just because I can't prove it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 13:45, 9 April 2007 (EDT)