Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 128: Line 128:  
:Absolutely agree.  This is just an attempted smear on Clinton because CP doesn't like her politic leanings.  As CP prides itself on not containing gossip, this is hypocrisy incarnate.  RobS you should be ashamed of yourself.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)
 
:Absolutely agree.  This is just an attempted smear on Clinton because CP doesn't like her politic leanings.  As CP prides itself on not containing gossip, this is hypocrisy incarnate.  RobS you should be ashamed of yourself.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)
 
::The "open marriage" term appears in the 1992 ''American Spectator'' article, pay the subscription fee if you can't read it. Barbara Olsen also uses the term.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 20 January 2012 (EST)
 
::The "open marriage" term appears in the 1992 ''American Spectator'' article, pay the subscription fee if you can't read it. Barbara Olsen also uses the term.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:04, 20 January 2012 (EST)
 +
:::Th Barbara Olsen book is not a reliable source - and I know that you know that.  Even if it does say it in the Spectator article, it is still gossip, still a blatant attempt to smear someone because you disagree with their politics.  It is pathetic and unbecoming of an encyclopedia that has as one of its commandments "no gossip".  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:09, 20 January 2012 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907

edits

Navigation menu