Changes

:::Th Barbara Olsen book is not a reliable source - and I know that you know that.  Even if it does say it in the Spectator article, it is still gossip, still a blatant attempt to smear someone because you disagree with their politics.  It is pathetic and unbecoming of an encyclopedia that has as one of its commandments "no gossip".  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:09, 20 January 2012 (EST)

:::Th Barbara Olsen book is not a reliable source - and I know that you know that.  Even if it does say it in the Spectator article, it is still gossip, still a blatant attempt to smear someone because you disagree with their politics.  It is pathetic and unbecoming of an encyclopedia that has as one of its commandments "no gossip".  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 16:09, 20 January 2012 (EST)

::::And frankly, who cares? Unless Bill or Hillary comes out and says it to be true, why does anyone care what some writer speculates about the Clintons? Its beneath this encyclopedia to be dragging gossip from the bottom of the barrel like this.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:13, 20 January 2012 (EST)

::::And frankly, who cares? Unless Bill or Hillary comes out and says it to be true, why does anyone care what some writer speculates about the Clintons? Its beneath this encyclopedia to be dragging gossip from the bottom of the barrel like this.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:13, 20 January 2012 (EST)